majid fouladiyan; hasan rezaeebahrabad
Abstract
Egocentricity is known as a historical feature in Iranian's collective psychology, but according to the theorist of this theory, such a feature exists in Iranian's community, even nowadays and its negative consequences are still unavoidable. Therefore, it makes sense to search for current scientific ...
Read More
Egocentricity is known as a historical feature in Iranian's collective psychology, but according to the theorist of this theory, such a feature exists in Iranian's community, even nowadays and its negative consequences are still unavoidable. Therefore, it makes sense to search for current scientific methods in order to find effective factors in creating and existence of such a phenomenon as well as theorizing and evaluating its historical effects; because most of the contemporary historic failures in Iran can be related to this issue. Hence the main question of this research would be: What are effective factors in Iranians' Egocentricity? In order to answer this question, we have tried to get to a valid evaluation through the secondary analysis of data gathered in Tehran, and design and test a rhetoric model based on applied indexes in mentioned evaluation. The study population in this research has been1256 people who were chosen systematically. Results show that the Egocentricity in more than 15% of the interviewees has been too little or a little; more than 44% in average; and more than 40% too much or more. Also, the multiple correlation rates equaled 0.446, T square as 0.119, and justified rate as 0.196. It shows that about 20% of the Egocentricity variance is determined by current variables. The fatalism variable shows the highest effective rate as 0.276 and social alienating and powerlessness follow that respectively. All three mentioned variables (independent) have a positive significance in Egocentricity (dependent). It means that increasing each of the mentioned three variables will increase the level of Egocentricity in people.
majid fouladiyan; hasan rezaeebahrabad; mohsen sohanianhaghighi
Abstract
The main questions of this research are that what elements of this compound are in the young population of Iranian society? How has each of these elements evolved over the past decades, and what has been the ups and downs? What is the relationship between the components of the collective identity of ...
Read More
The main questions of this research are that what elements of this compound are in the young population of Iranian society? How has each of these elements evolved over the past decades, and what has been the ups and downs? What is the relationship between the components of the collective identity of Iranian youth? What kind of combination is this composition and how is it arranged, commented, traded, and how is the interaction between these elements? Research method of this study was longitudinal and national study based on the secondary analysis of quantitative data of variables studied in the period of 1973-94. The results show that the religious identity with an average of 11/83 was on the scale of 100 most prevalent types of identity over the years in the Iranian youth community. After that, the national identity with the mean of 29/80 is the most widely spread among the youth. Ethnic identity with 53/46 and also modern identity with 03/52 are the next. In terms of correlation tests and according to the correlation chart, it can generally be concluded that there is a relationship between national identity and ethnic identity among young people in the year 86. Correlation coefficient of these two direct and significant variables is moderate. Also, the results of the Spearman correlation test between the national identity and religious identity among the youth in the years 79, 86, 84, 88 indicate the existence of a relationship between the two identities.